Forensic video investigation

The video you already have, finally searchable.

Ask for the grey sedan that passed the store between 6 and 7pm. Get the clip in about a minute. Veritas runs on one appliance inside your network, with a chain of custody built for the courtroom.

No cloud tenancy No inbound access Nothing leaves your network

Why offices buy it

Your evidence system stores video. It does not find anything.

Axon, Genetec, NICE and Motorola solved storing and sharing evidence, and they solved it well. None of them let a prosecutor ask a question of the footage. That gap is where a case gets lost, and it is the only thing Veritas does.

Search, not storage

Semantic, face, plate and image search across the whole archive. The search that takes a paralegal a day takes about a minute.

Runs with the cable unplugged

Not cloud with a compliance certificate. Actually offline. For sealed cases, contraband material and internal affairs, that is the only permissible design.

Built for the prosecutor

Tracked, expiring, access-logged disclosure to defense counsel. The competing tools are built around patrol capture and treat your office as a recipient.

For the people who have to approve it

One box. Nothing to integrate on day one.

Veritas is an appliance that sits on your network. There is no cloud tenancy, no inbound access, no agent on anyone's workstation and no data leaving the building. Your IT team can audit the box because the box is the whole system.

It never transmits criminal justice information anywhere, because it never transmits anything. Ingest starts as a watched folder, so nothing has to be rebuilt before you see value.

Cloud evidence tools

Your footage on someone else's infrastructure

Veritas

Your footage on your own hardware

Multi-year subscription

Capital equipment, invoiced once

Vendor holds the keys

Unplug the cable and it still works

Built around patrol capture

Built around the prosecutor's workflow

Evidence integrity

Every answer has to survive cross-examination.

Integrity is not a report the system prints at the end. It is how the system records everything as it happens.

Hashed the moment it exists

A SHA-256 is computed from the exact bytes written to disk at extraction time, not re-derived later when someone asks for it.

An audit trail that detects tampering

Every upload, search, view, flag, export and hand-off is recorded with who, when and from where. Entries are hash-chained, so removing or editing one breaks the chain and names the row it broke on.

Disclosure you can prove

Hand evidence to defense counsel as a tracked package with a named recipient, an expiry and a log of every access. You can show what you turned over and when.

Redaction before it leaves

Blur faces and plates and strip audio on the exported copy. The original stays untouched and the export records what was redacted.

How it buys

It closes inside your grant's period of performance.

Federal justice grants buy equipment far more easily than they buy subscriptions. A multi-year subscription creates an out-year funding obligation that grant-funded agencies specifically struggle to commit to.

Veritas ships as an appliance: delivered, invoiced, done. That is a procurement advantage, not just a technical one.

Talk to us about a pilot
  1. 1

    Sixty days on your own footage

    Not a sandbox and not our demo reel. Your cases, on a unit in your building.

  2. 2

    Credited in full

    The pilot fee comes off the purchase price. If it does not earn its place, it ends there.

  3. 3

    Bought as equipment

    One capital line, invoiced once, closing inside the grant window rather than after it.

  4. 4

    Support priced not to be reviewed

    The annual covers updates and support. It is deliberately small.

Straight answers

The questions every office asks.

We already use Axon. Does this replace it?

No, and it should not. Keep it. Axon stores and shares evidence well. Veritas sits behind whatever you already run and makes the archive searchable. The question worth asking is what an investigator does today when they need every white pickup on the 14th.

Our policy does not allow facial recognition.

Then leave it switched off. Face matching is a module, and the audit trail records that it is disabled. Most of the value is in plain-language description search, which involves no biometric matching at all.

Is it CJIS compliant?

It never transmits criminal justice information anywhere, because it has no external connection. It runs inside your network on hardware you control, and your security team can audit the appliance directly.

How do we know the system did not miss something?

It is a search tool, not a decision-maker. It surfaces candidates for a human to review, ranked by confidence, and every action a reviewer takes is written to the chain of custody. It narrows where to look; it does not decide.

What happens if the appliance fails?

The database is backed up nightly and a spare unit can be supplied. Every evidence hash is held in the database, so a restored unit re-verifies a separately restored media library file by file.

We need it to work with our existing system.

Watched-folder ingest works on day one, which is why nothing has to be rebuilt before you see whether it helps. Named integrations get built when a customer names one.

Bring one case. We will search it with you.

Thirty minutes, your own footage, and a question you have not been able to answer quickly. That is the whole demo.